A Law Firm Can Easily Handle Your Paternity Case

Being a parent is a proud accomplishment for many people. It is sometimes very easy for a person to not know they are a parent or to be parenting a child that is not theirs. Some men want to be the father of the child and just simply do not know. Others may need assistance in proving the child is not theirs. For mothers who know the father, law firms can summon them to a paternity test to prove they are responsible and get the child the support they deserve.

Paternity comes in question when the court needs to determine if someone is liable for child support and other legal matters regarding children. In order to award child support money to the primary care parent, a paternity test may be required. This will legally acknowledge the relationship between the parent and the child. When two people are married and a child is conceived and born, they are considered to have full rights and obligations to the child. However, if one of the parties can provide evidence that the child may not be theirs a paternity test will be ordered by the court before any court decisions are made for child support during a divorce.

When a mother was not married, the man can accept the paternity rights. The mother can petition the court for legal orders to determine the father of the child. Once the father has been determined, they may choose to be involved and exercise their parental rights through a parenting plan. This plan says how each parent will share in the responsibilities of the child including legal custody, visitation, and medical insurance.

Paternity suits are in most cases assumed to be due to the man refusing to pay child support as a result of the two parties not being married when the child was conceived. This is true, but they also can occur within a marriage in cases where the wife was unfaithful. The husband may question whether the child is his and need it to be scientifically proven for issues such as custody and child support in divorce cases.

In many cases a father who is proven to not be the paternal father may be required to support the child if they did so prior to the divorce. This depends on the state. Many states have now passed laws that remove the responsibility if the man is not the paternal father. When a child is legally adopted, the father is still responsible for supporting them. Often the paternity test is ordered by the court to determine the actual father of the child for a proper court decision.

Divorce attorneys can be very helpful in cases like these because they already know all other aspects of the divorce and custody decisions. They can file the petitions and other forms necessary for the paternity test and serve your best interests. No matter what the issue is, knowing your rights and responsibilities can help you provide the information your lawyer needs for a solid case.

Sometimes things aren’t always straightforward when it comes to children. Maybe you are a mom who needs to legally determine the father for child support, or are going through a nasty divorce where your wife was unfaithful.

Virtual Assistants Can Provide Valuable Legal Support Services to Law Firms

Every business should be interested in lowering costs and increasing productivity and revenue. Right? Right. A virtual assistant is your answer.

Over the last two years law firms cut costs by laying off support staff. The firms did so to reduce costs as a result of an economic downturn or slow and declining business that resulted in decreased revenue.

Earlier this month an article in The American Lawyer reported that the law firm Mayer Brown cut 135 employees – lawyers and staff, and, some time later, an article in the New York Law Journal reported that the firm laid off 75 employees, including 28 lawyers. (source of articles: Law.com) Mayer Brown has seen a reduction in staff due to cuts and layoffs of 210 employees this month. Lawshucks.com tracks law firm layoffs and indicates on its website that as of April 8, 2010, 14,696 jobs were eliminated at major law firms (5,772 lawyers / 8,924 staff) since January 2008. This data shows a higher percentage of staff layoffs (~61%) compared to that of attorney layoffs – 39%. Lawshucks.com further indicates that there have been 485 layoffs this year (186 attorneys/299 staff); this number also represents a higher percentage of staff layoffs (62%) compared to attorney layoffs of 38%. A decline in revenue and a slow recovery have prompted law firms to eliminate attorney and staff/support services positions.

Law firms can get the support services they need by engaging the services of a virtual assistant. A virtual assistant (also referred to as a VA) is a highly skilled entrepreneur that typically works from his/her home-based business providing business and/or legal support services through the effective use of technology.

The advent of the Internet and the endless progression and availability of technology enable VAs to collaborate remotely with clients from virtually anywhere in the world. VAs have been providing support services to businesses for many years. The phrase virtual assistant came into being in the ’90s, and the VA industry has seen increased growth. Support and networking organizations such as The International Virtual Assistants Association provide assistance and support to VAs worldwide. VAs provide valuable services worldwide to businesses of all types.

Services Offered by a VA

Traditionally, VAs provided secretarial and administrative services; however, today VAs provide a wealth of services that include, but are not limited to, the following types of services:

  • legal secretarial;
  • word processing/document management;
  • paralegal support;
  • tape transcription;
  • research and writing;
  • travel / conference arrangements;
  • marketing communications support;
  • desktop publishing;
  • website design;
  • content management – website, blog, wiki;
  • database management;
  • computer/technical support;
  • event management; and
  • human resource management.

In this economic downtown, a VA can be a vital part of any business. With law firms cutting costs and eliminating support services personnel, it makes good sense for a law firm (or an attorney) to hire a qualified VA for its support needs or as an extension of its business. Any legal entity or legal professional considering using the services of a VA will likely want to consider one with a legal background.

The services that a VA can perform and provide are endless. Lawyers looking to start their own practices will find the services of a VA indispensable.

Advantages of Utilizing a VA

Wondering what you gain by utilizing a VA? The benefits are plenty. Imagine eliminating:

  • costs associated with hiring a permanent employee (recruiting expenses, salary, taxes, benefits/vacations, pensions, insurance, space rental, and equipment (computer, software, furniture, telephone, etc.));
  • downtime associated with an employee not showing up for work – lost productivity;
  • costs associated with employee turnover;
  • costs associated with training; and
  • any number of other associated costs with hiring and maintaining a permanent employee.

With a VA you pay only for the services performed – a very cost-effective solution. Whether you need 2 hours, 4 hours or a full day, you’re not saddled with paying unnecessary expenses. Most professional VAs will have years of experience in their particular field or area of expertise.

You can’t do it all so what better time than now to hire a VA to assist you with meeting your business goals. As a business owner you have specialized skills that enable you to generate income for your business, but if you spend time handling tasks that a VA could perform you lose income and decrease productivity. That doesn’t have to be the case. Collaborate with a VA to get the business support services you need, keep costs down, increase productivity and ultimately increase revenue.

When Considering Hiring a VA

When looking to hire a VA check out the VA’s website to get a sense of the type of person she/he is. The website should list at a minimum:

  • the services offered;
  • professional and educational background of the VA;
  • a method of contact; and
  • rates charged – highly skilled VAs may charge anywhere from $40 to $100 per hour depending on the service (rates vary and in some instances can be higher).

You should also e-mail or call the VA to see how responsive the VA is. You might also be able to contact the VA via a form on their website. The website should provide you with enough information to determine if the VA is someone you would like to do business with. Once you have reviewed the website and like what you have seen, make contact with the VA. The conversation(s) you experience with the VA will further determine if a business relationship is viable.

A VA may require:

  • a minimum number of hour(s) to get started working with you,
  • that you sign a contract for services, and
  • a down payment before beginning any work.

The Tech Savvy Lawyer – Web Technologies And Legal Firms

The Legal Industry & Information Technology

Like all other industries, the legal industry is not insulated from the tremendous changes in information technology over the past decade, and the challenges and opportunities it presents. If anything, the changes have more bearing on law firms & departments because information management is at the core of what they do – consulting with clients, colleagues or experts; increasing compliance & regulation demands, wading through a constantly expanding sea of legislation and case law; managing outsourcing partners; keeping abreast with latest developments; or managing a mountain of matter files.

Recent Trends

Perhaps the most significant change in the legal services industry the decline of “relationship lawyering”.

Recent times have seen increased competition, & changes in underlying market structure. There has been a continuing trend of decline of “relationship lawyering”. Traditionally strong relationships between law firms and corporates are eroding, with more companies opting for in-house legal departments, or “shopping around” for the best deal. Another significant trend is the increasing convergence of legal markets, where competition is as likely to come from a firm in another state or overseas as from a local firm. These & other developments are exerting greater pressures on legal firms to be more efficient, an it is imperative that attorneys spend their time analyzing information, rather than organizing or managing it.

Drivers of Technology Adoption by Legal Firms

Possibilities of Technology – The primary driver of greater use of information technology by legal firms is developments in technology itself. New technologies & greater bandwidths allow great possibilities in the arenas of information management, productivity and remote collaboration. Information can be moved over the internet with greater security. And unlike yesteryear, law firms can access these technologies without hefty costs and the need to set up specialized IT departments.

In 2004, Forrester Research Inc estimated that some 39,000 legal jobs will have moved offshore by the end of 2008.

Outsourcing/Offhsoring – Legal firms are now increasingly open to legal process outsourcing of tasks they traditionally held close – research, transcription, coding and even legal research and the drafting of legal documents. It is commonplace to see a NY based law firm, subletting research work to a team of professional lawyers & paralegals in Bangalore, India. This enables firms to majorly cut down costs & concentrate on core legal functions. But it also necessitates a greater need to communicate, collaborate & monitor the functioning of outsourcing vendors hundreds or thousands of miles away. Security is also an issue, since performance of the services often requires access to regulated consumer data or other sensitive data.

In 2004, almost 60% of lawyers worked at multi-office firms and over 10% of lawyers work at firms with ten or more offices.

Geographic Diversification – As mentioned before, there is a distinct movement towards multiple office firms, with offices spread both nationally and globally. US based companies are now serving many foreign clients, or serving foreign interests of domestic clients. There was a significant presence of international clients in even the smallest law firms of 1 to 20 lawyers. There has also been a spate of global mergers and acquisitions of law firms in the new millennia. All this necessitates a greater need for communication, collaboration and information exchange between branches.

Regulatory Compliance – Since the Sarbanes Oxley Act came into effect, records management has become an essential requirement. Organizations are required by law to retain certain documents for predefined periods. Also, the amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure went into effect on December 1, 2006, and apply to any firm involved in litigation in the U.S. Federal Court system. The amendments mandate that companies be prepared for electronic discovery. Firms have to drastically alter the way they preserve, retrieve and produce electronic data.

Competition is coming both from firms spread across the nation & the globe, as well as consultants & advisors who were traditionally not considered part of the “legal industry”

Competition – Because of the death of relationship lawyering, and “one stop shopping” by clients, firms cannot afford to be complacent anymore. Moreover, competition is as likely to come from the opposite end of the country or globe, as from local companies. Competition is also coming from other quarters, consultants and advisors who offer services that were previously the purview of lawyers. In this arena of intense competition, lawyers have to double up as “rainmakers” ; networkers (legal business development) in addition to traditional roles.

IT Needs of the Legal Industry

Centralized Document Storage – The legal profession generates a tremendous amount of digital information in the form of case files, contracts, court filings, exhibits, evidence, briefs, agreements, bills, notes, records and other office activity such as email. This information is the firm’s collective knowledge & learning which sets it apart from competition and needs to be retrieved again and again. Compliance also requires certain documents to be stored & retrievable for extended periods of time. Attorneys across different offices need to access and collaborate on this information.

In 2007, 53% percent of lawyers used a PDA outside of the office, 32% to check e-mail.

ABA Law Tech Report 2007

Remote Access – Ready access to crucial documents and information can sometimes be all the difference between a favorable or adverse judgment. Lawyers now have wings on their feet visiting clients, interviewing experts, or attending outstation court proceedings, and are often out of office. It is important that they are able gain LAN like access to documents from the firm’s repository even when they’re not at the office premises.

Document Collaboration – It is not enough to only be able to access documents from the firm’s storage. A single case file may need multiple inputs from attorneys with different expertise, clients, experts, researchers, and other associates spread over the country or even the globe (in case of outsourcing). Therefore it is important to have the ability to concurrently access and work together on the same file, from right where everybody is.

Remote Conferencing – Sometimes the ability to collaborate on a document may not suffice and actual discussion and knocking together of heads might be needed. Web conferencing allows multiple people to get together in a virtual meeting room and discuss issues as effectively as being there in person.

Security – A lot of the information a legal firm handles is highly sensitive client information, which it is bound my business ethics and contracts to protect. Since this information is mostly accessed and distributed over the public network of internet, and often distributed to third parties at some page, security is right at the top as a concern.

Access Control – Another level of security is the ability to manage who sees what information and what they can do with it. Since multiple parties like attorneys and associates across the company, outsourcing partners, and multiple clients access information from the firm’s central storage this is of prime importance.

Productivity Applications – Although managing documents and information is one of the most important things a law firms IT systems need to do, it is not all. They also need the ability to manage and share schedules, to maintain lists of important contacts, to manage and track different tasks and litigations teams or individual attorneys may be involved with, or billing management.

What They Don’t Need

41% of lawyers had no IT staff at any locations for their firm, while 17% have one person, 8% have two, and 38% have three or more

ABA Law Tech Report 2006

IT Hassles – If getting all the above goodies requires setting up a specialized IT department, installing expensive hardware, and managing ongoing maintenance and upgrades, it might just not be worth it for a small to mid sized law firm. Bigger firms have the deep pockets and incentive to set up dedicated systems, but it might not be sustainable for smaller firms.

Complexity – To ensure that attorneys embrace the IT system, attorneys should be able to concentrate on the information itself, rather than grappling with the nitty-gritties of the system.

3 Tips on Picking a Good Lawyer: Free Legal Information

Sooner or later, you may need a lawyer to defend you. It’s easy to think that all you need to do is, go to a law firm, hire a lawyer and let him/her represent you. But it’s certainly not that simple always! Lawyers are numerous, yet picking a good lawyer only constitutes to a small number. Compound this complication with the verity that the success of your case will greatly rely on how well you choose your legal representative. So, if you’re faced with this very daunting task, you have to specifically know who you’re really looking for.

You have to understand first that you’re looking for someone with whom you can frankly discuss the legal aspects of your case. You’re not looking for a friend, companion or a shoulder to cry on. You’re aiming to have a lawyer. Therefore, do not expect personal advices and treatment to come from your lawyer. Everything is limited to business and professional relationship alone.

Now in picking a good lawyer, you must look for specific qualities and specialties. If you have marital issues and are planning to ending your relationship, a divorce attorney would be suitable for your case. If you have real estate problems, an intellectual property lawyer would be of great help. And if you have a criminal case, then you must definitely opt for a criminal defense lawyer. Know your lawyer’s specialty and it will be easier for you to narrow down your choices.

Another great consideration is in terms of payment. Choosing a good lawyer would mean a hefty professional fee. Keep in mind that lawyers are paid on an hourly basis especially those handling criminal cases and those doing a regular legal work for you. However, if you don’t have funds for these kinds of lawyers, you can always go for public defenders. Their availability may be limited, but you can still make the most out of these defenders without shedding a hefty price.

Finally, picking a good lawyer is possible by doing your own research. You can ask people you know who have been on a similar situation as yours.

Can Your Law Firm “Legally” Collect Purchased Debt?

Is your law firm expanding to meet the needs of our market today? With the economy and credit crisis raging around us, this is a feasible step for an attorney to take. If you decide to take this step with your practice, be sure to educate yourself on compliance issues and laws that may pertain to you as you move forward in this type of venture. Do you need to be licensed or bonded? What states will you branch out into? Do they have laws specific to debt buyers and debt collection that will affect how you handle accounts?

By purchasing debts rather than working on a contingency basis, law firms have more flexibility with collecting and litigation. A law firm that owns their own debt has more flexibility with collecting and litigation and can also re-sell the debt or outsource it to be collected, freeing up more time for other tasks. Purchasing debt can also give you stable work that you can count on, when you rely on clients to place accounts with your firm on a contingency basis, you cannot plan ahead or count on a certain amount of work per week or month. Purchasing debt gives you that stability. Many attorneys purchase debt specifically to put the debts through litigation and get them collected in the most efficient and quickest way possible.

There are some things attorneys must be aware of when they decide to purchase debt to litigate on or try to collect on in any way. All attorneys in all states must abide by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when they collect on any debt, contingency or purchased. There are also compliance requirements in each state including specific wording to be included on any dunning notices and in some instances you may be required to be licensed and bonded in order to collect on any debts you purchase or that are placed with you on a contingency basis.

I spoke with Louise Epstein of Charge off Clearinghouse and she recommends that you become familiar with the statutes of limitations for debts that you may purchase. The statute of limitations for a delinquent debt is the time limit for the creditor to file a lawsuit, once you purchase this debt you take on the role of the creditor. This period starts when the debtor becomes delinquent. The fact that the statute of limitations has expired on a debt will not necessarily prevent a lawsuit but the debtor can have the suit dismissed on this basis. The statute of limitations only covers lawsuits, so if you are purchasing debt to litigate this would affect you.

While doing research for this article I contacted all 50 states to ask them about state specific laws relevant to attorney’s debt purchasing and collecting on those purchased debts. Many states have no provisions for this type of collection activity by attorneys but as this area becomes much more popular as it has in recent months, states may be forced to come up with compliance plans and rules to regulate this sector. While the economy continues to falter more and more attorneys and collection agency owners are purchasing more debt than ever before, and it is becoming more and more available with a huge surplus as many debtors succumb to the recession and lose their jobs or become past due on bills. After contacting all 50 states and visiting their websites to look for this type of information only 23 states have gotten back to me as of the printing of this article. I have compiled all the information they have shared with me along with the source of that information to aid attorneys who purchase debt in their quest to collect and stay within the law. Many of the state offices I did speak with told me that there are no laws in their state specific to attorneys buying debt and then working that debt. Based on my research and this information I have created a Special Report relative to State specific laws relevant to an attorney purchasing debt and collecting on it which is available on my website.

The Wall Street Journal reported on the front page on February 5, 2008 that banks are tightening up their lending standards for businesses and consumers. The article states that with bad loans piling up, some lenders are strained for capital. This can cause more banks to look into selling their bad debt than ever before. The signs show that more and more debt will be sold in the coming months, and many states are not ready with compliance requirements and laws pertaining to attorneys who purchase debt and then collect on it or outsource it to be collecting and what their rights are and what the laws are that they should be following.

As you purchase debt and collect on it, keep in mind that you should check your dunning notices if you are sending collection letters to the accounts you purchased. Many states have requirements for the letters that can pertain to any third party collector whether you are an attorney or a debt collection agency. Some things you can look for are having your physical address on your letter, having your hours of operation on your letter, having your license number and main office address on your letter and many more.

Your Guide to Finding the Perfect Law Firm

When an individual faces potential legal action, it is necessary to call upon a trained attorney. However, finding the best law firm is not a simple task of looking one up in the phonebook. Getting the best legal representation will take a little effort. Understanding what to look for and what questions to ask will help narrow down your choices.

Ask Friends and Family

The first and best place to start a search for the best legal representation to suit your personal needs is to talk to friends and family. However, before meeting with an attorney, even one that is recommended, make sure you have an understanding of why this professional has been recommended. Find out what they did for the person making the recommendation and why they would be the best choice for you.

Come to the Attorney Meeting Prepared

When visiting a prospective law firm, it is important to come fully prepared. Copy all documents and reports pertaining to your legal representation needs and bring them to the first meeting. These materials should include all documents relating to your specific case, such as bills, medical records, witness accounts, other contact information, as well as, law enforcement reports. Be prepared to describe your situation in clear terms that will allow the law firm to respond in a way that will help you decide if this is the best legal representation for you.

To Help Make a Decision Ask Questions

Before meeting with a law firm or attorney write down some questions that will help you gather the information you need to make a decision including:

  • How long has the firm or attorney practiced this particular type of law?
  • How experienced is the lawyer assigned to your case?
  • How does the attorney or law firm believe your situation needs to be handled?
  • What will be your participation in the case?
  • What kind of communication will there be?
  • Will a fee agreement detailed all expenses, billing and payment arrangements?

Conduct a Self-Evaluation After Meeting a Law Firm or Attorney

  • After meeting an attorney or firm, it is time to ask yourself some questions about hiring legal representation, such as:
  • How comfortable do you feel working closely with this firm or attorney?
  • What is your level of confidence concerning the experience and skill level that will be handling your case?
  • Do you understand the lawyer’s explanation about the situation and all that it legally involves?
  • Did the law firm or attorney take the proper amount of time to examine the documents you presented?
  • Do you have a good understanding of the fee agreement?

It may take several meetings with various law firms in order to make a decision about which one would provide the best legal representation. However, it is important not to rush into selecting a law firm or attorney, as the outcome of the case will largely depend on this factor.

Law Firm Collections – The 10 Biggest Mistakes In Managing Their Accounts Receivable

The demands of an ever-growing legal profession require law firms to have forward-thinking management strategies to address clients’ needs. Although lawyers’ main priority is – and must be – to deliver quality service, law firms must also build their organizations to support their clients’ evolving demands, by taking steps such as opening international offices, embracing new technologies, and developing new areas of practice.

As a result of this growth, law firms will face high overhead and growing compensation demands from their professionals. Meanwhile, firms will be squeezed from the other side by clients who have high expectations yet, at the same time, scrutinize their bills.

During the course of a year, many firms find it difficult to judge how well their collection efforts are faring and how this could impact their financial pictures. Lawyers have been conditioned to take a relaxed attitude in their collection efforts, largely due to a mindset among attorneys that grants clients the benefit of the doubt and a view among clients that making payments is not a priority. Attorneys also fail to realize that clients will take advantage of their professional relationship. Thus begins a vicious cycle. Lawyers are not vigilant in getting their clients to pay and the clients, as a result, are not quick to pay. The lawyers, then, are reluctant to press their clients. And so on.

The business of buying legal services does not lend itself to such strict purchase and payment rules.

It often involves complicated transactions, equally complex business relationships, and disputed resolutions that require many hours of work at high billing rates, resulting in high bills to clients. Stopping work because a client does not pay is sometimes not an option because of ethical obligations.

The reality is that problems with collections within the legal profession are not a financial management

issue. It’s all about effective practice management, which requires attorneys and law firms to manage

their accounts receivable proactively. However good the firm’s financial staff may be, attorneys are ultimately responsible for the success – or failure – of collection efforts because they who steer the relationships with clients.

When it comes to receivables, law firms fall victim to 10 common mistakes:

1. Attorneys believe that aging receivables are not an indicator that collection problems exist. Actually, if bills have not been paid within 90 days, you have received the first sign that you may have a collection problem – and, if it is not resolved quickly, they could age further and be virtually uncollectible. Only 50 percent of receivables over 120 days will be collected, and the likelihood drops precipitously after that.

Clients reason that if the firm has waited several months to try to collect unpaid bills, they can wait to pay those bills. They assume, and with good reason, that they are in better position to negotiate discounts. The longer a law firm waits to collect unpaid bills, savvy clients realize, the more likely the bills will end up being discounted or written off altogether.

2. Law firms fear they will damage client relationships by asking clients to pay their bills. The fact is that law firms lose clients by doing poor work or by failing to deliver client service, not by asking clients to pay their bills. Efforts to manage receivables will not hurt the relationship, as long as it is done professionally. Actually, most clients are perfectly willing to pay their bills, although many are dealing with cash flow problems. Also, clients fall victim to “sticker shock,” which happens when a client expects to receive a bill of a certain size and gets a rude awakening when larger invoices arrive.

3. Lawyers avoid addressing problems by depending on the mail to communicate with delinquent clients.

Postal mail is slower and far less effective than using the telephone to address delinquency issues. A conversation allows you to have a dialogue about the bill. Besides, letters and reminder statements are easily misplaced and avoided. If the client continues to receive reminder statements after 60 days and still does not pay, chances are there is an issue preventing payment. Even a brief, non-confrontational telephone conversation should communicate to the client the urgency of your need for payment and allow you to learn quickly if there are any problems or concerns – and what it will take to get the bill paid.

4. Firms believe that accounting and collection software will cure all that ails them. Software can be an excellent tool to manage receivables, but it is only as good as the people using it. Many law

firms have developed policies and procedures to better manage their accounts receivable, but many have not properly utilized their software to help implement new systems. It takes time and specialization to fully grasp how the software can help a firm’s collection efforts. Law firm staffs are often responsible for many day-to-day tasks that leave them little time to explore and make maximum use of the functions that software offers.

5. Firms embrace alternative payment arrangements too quickly. Complex transactions may not lend themselves to a regular payment schedule, and they may cause confusion as to appropriate payment if the deal does not come to fruition. Furthermore, risky deals sometimes fail, leaving a trail of unpaid receivables.

6. Lawyers fail to recognize the point at which they should stop doing work rather than continuing to

amass unpaid bills. Sometimes lawyers become so wrapped up in their work that they do not pay

sufficient attention to bills that are not getting paid. By the time they realize clients are not paying, they have put in plenty of additional time. Someone – and perhaps the attorney is not the right person – should be monitoring payment so work does not far out-pace payment.

7. Accounts receivable management reports are not providing the right information to measure progress. Accounting departments are churning out a lot of reports concerning receivables. But are these reports answering the key questions that will allow the firm to maximize its collections? Why is the client delinquent? Is delinquency habitual for this client? What can the firm do to facilitate payment, both in the short and long terms?

8. Law firms are not analyzing the right reports to manage accounts receivable. Most firms still use

generic financial reports that have too much extraneous information to target problem offenders. Instead, firms need to generate more useful information. For instance, firms need to know if an account is being actively pursued and what the payment status is. They need to know who is pursuing the collection efforts (the attorney or the collection staff) and whether they are getting results. They need to categorize their accounts in order to know the reasons clients are not paying, such as cash flow problems, disputed fees and

services, or third-party responsibility. They need to know where the problem accounts are in order to determine a plan of action to get the bills paid.

9. Law firms are not spending enough time focusing on older, aging receivables. As a result of the growing legal profession, most firms continue to bring in new business while maintaining strong realization and focusing on more current accounts receivable. Firm management may be so busy building the firm for the future that it is ignoring the reality that a lot of receivables are slipping through their hands. They do not fully realize that increasing collections with payments from aging receivables is a fast and effective way to put more money into the partners’ pockets.

10. Law firms are not making collection staff or departments accountable for producing results. Many law firms fail to evaluate their staffs’ performances in collecting aging receivables. The collection staff is, therefore, left with little guidance as to what its collection responsibilities should be – and this does not necessarily include addressing and pursuing older, more difficult accounts. Collection staffs often end up being responsible only for monitoring payment of ongoing clients, sending reminder statements, or providing accounts receivable reports to attorneys. Although these duties are important, they do not address the more fundamental issues concerning collecting for complicated transactions and for client relationships that require more individual attention.

Law Firm Marketing – Becoming Client Centric

The Client Experience

Receiving exceptional service is always a memorable experience. It can make a person feel valued. And news of exceptional service spreads fast. It’s talked about to friends and family and even eulogized to strangers. It can transcend the ordinary and take on an almost mythical form. This is especially true when ordinary things are done in extraordinary ways.

Years ago, I had to fly to Bangkok on a business trip. After a long, trying taxi ride in rush-hour traffic, I finally checked into my hotel, tired and hungry. I dropped my luggage in the room and went down-stairs to get some dinner. An hour later, when I returned, I found my luggage neatly unpacked–shirts folded, pants hung up, ties carefully dispersed along the racks. Almost immediately, I began to relax. I involuntarily breathed a sigh of relief.

Then I looked into the bathroom and saw something I’ll never forget. The items from my overnight kit had been neatly arranged by the sink,?and someone had actually cleaned my hairbrush. All of the hair strands had been removed and the bristles were glistening. But the coup de grace was this: Resting in the center of the bristles was a beautiful white petal.
After more than ten years, I can still see this image. This one experience–this unexpected gesture that went beyond exceptional service–left me with a whole new understanding of what it means to put a client first.

When I returned home and people asked about Thailand, I invariably told them about that small white petal on my hairbrush. Today, when I think of great hotels, I think of the Hotel Oriental. It is the standard by which I judge all other hotels.

In the universe of companies, only a few consistently reach extraordinary levels of service. Studies have shown that companies that do reach such levels share certain fundamental values and organizational traits.

Marketing a Service

There is a fundamental distinction between marketing a product and marketing a service. Products are tangible. They either work as represented or they don’t. Products can be returned or exchanged. We can touch and feel a product before we decide to buy it; rarely is this the case with a service.

Services are meant to be experienced, not ordered from catalogs. Serv-ices are profoundly personal in nature and our response to them is often emotionally driven. A service relation-ship, especially a professional service relationship, challenges the provider to be an expert in serving people.

Think about the ways buyers perceive “value” generally. When we buy products, we rely mostly on objective criteria. For products like shampoo and stereos, determining objective value is fairly simple. A large bottle of shampoo delivers more product than a small one, so we are justified in paying more for the large one. A stereo system that has more features is said to contain more value than one that has fewer features. Product features, quality and quantity are all critical factors in the determination of value. Service, however, is far more nebulous–and is therefore much more challenging to define and measure.

Service Is a Process, Not an End

One reason service is so difficult to measure is because it’s so subjective. It is experiential–we can feel it and see it, but defining it is another matter. Perhaps it’s a little like what the Supreme Court wrote about pornography: It may be hard to define, but we know it when we see it.

Truly great firms–those with legendary status–are always striving to reach greater levels of service for their clients. Fundamental to such firms is the understanding that service is a never-ending process driven by a specific mind-set. These firms know that while they must always try to reach higher levels of service, they can never assume they have achieved the highest level. There is always a higher level to strive for, and standing still squelches the pursuit of excellence. Either a firm continues to reach for higher service levels or it has abandoned the pursuit. There is no middle ground.

Most firms revolve around the desires and needs of their partners. For service-driven firms, just the opposite is true–not because these firms have partners who enjoy a higher sense of purpose, but because they have a higher sense of business smarts. For them, everything revolves around the client. And as you might expect, the benefits have a way of coming back to the partners. Consistently delivering increasingly higher levels of service to clients builds the types of returns that keep a firm thriving.

There is no quick and easy recipe for becoming a service-driven firm. There is no secret formula for meeting–and exceeding–your clients’ needs. But one of the best ways to find out how your firm can provide exceptional service for your clients is, strangely enough, one of the most frequently ignored: listening to what your clients need–being client-centric instead of firm-centric.

You may be convinced that your best clients have been attracted by the stature of your firm–by its size or its range of specialties. But the truth is that it’s not what you think you’re offering that counts, but rather what the clients are experiencing that matters most.

The Emotional Side

Providing a renowned level of service to clients requires paying attention and being sensitive to the emotional side of legal trouble.

Lawyers who pay attention to clients’ subjective experiences are able to expand the scope of legal and practical options available to their clients, which can result in the lawyers becoming better problem solvers.
Old marketing models were based on a number of false assumptions about what influences people’s decisions. Now that we know more about how the mind works, we have a unique opportunity to apply this knowledge to the goal of meeting our clients’ real needs as opposed to the needs we merely assume they have.
In our legal training, we are taught the paramount importance of words and logic. Even in the emotional setting of trial, most skilled attorneys–while highly attuned to the emotional reactions of juries–ultimately almost always rely on the persuasive power of logic, words and reason to win their cases.

Today, neuroscience is providing important insights into the ways people interpret information and the degree to which “thinking” is used to influence our decisions. Lawyers’ emphasis on words is based largely on the false assumption that most of our thinking takes place in our conscious minds. In fact, recent brain science research reveals that just the opposite is true: As much as 95 percent of our thinking actually takes place at the subconscious level.

Our memories, associations and emotions occur just below the surface of our awareness. In response to stimuli, our minds go busily to work at a staggering speed, networking, sharing, distributing, connecting, shuffling and reshuffling memories, images and thoughts before the first words of reaction ever leave our lips. Ironically, the words we speak are literally an afterthought.

How can this knowledge be applied to the way we communicate and deal with our clients? We would like to assume that clients, for the most part, make decisions deliberately and rationally. That is, that they consciously contemplate the relative merits of a choice, assign a value to each criterion and then convert this information into what we call a judgment. We’d certainly like to assume that’s how we make decisions ourselves! But the fact is, most decisions are made at the intuitive, emotional level.

Whether responding to an argument in the courtroom or to a firm’s marketing campaign, even the most intelligent people process their decisions below the surface of their conscious mind. In reality, words and logic have more to do with justifying a decision than forming the basis of one.

Consider how clients choose law firms. They may think they were led by logic–going with “a big firm” or choosing on the basis of a lawyer’s “professional demeanor,” but they are actually using their intuition to make a highly subjective -decision.

When attorneys learn to think emotionally, they will find new ways to communicate with their clients at the decision-making level. Therefore, providing a renowned level of service to clients means expanding the quality of personal attention given to the emotional side of problem solving. Lawyers who pay attention to clients’ subjective experiences are able to offer a wide scope of practical and legal options for their clients to consider.

“We see the same problems over and over again,” a partner in a small Cleveland practice explained. “When we know our clients are going through a painful time in their life, our job is often to help them connect the dots at a personal level. This requires us to think emotionally–to become more empathetic–so that we can get inside the minds of our clients. But the truth is, even in the context of law, a client’s decision process is driven more strongly by emotion than by any other single factor.”
Emotion is a stronger influence on the decision-making process, but words are not even a close second, although it’s a common assumption that we think in words.

While words play a central role in communicating thoughts, we rarely use them to think. Using words is just too slow, and language does not contain enough bandwidth to accommodate the complexity of our think-ing processes. Feelings can be both instantaneous and complex in ways that words cannot be.

The law firm that recognizes the important role emotions play in its clients’ decision-making process and adjusts its service accordingly will find new opportunities to provide clients with increasingly higher levels of service.

Knowledge Sharing

Professional service marketing is both knowledge intensive and relation-ship intensive. For law firms in particular, knowledge-sharing and relationship-building are two essential elements of providing quality legal counsel, and they need to work together. Developing client relationships comes from sharing knowledge in ways that build confidence and trust.
Unfortunately, many lawyers are reluctant to share their knowledge with clients. Some would rather create a shroud of mystery around their work, forcing clients to view them as indispensable–an especially effective technique for a lawyer who has already been successful in solving a prior legal problem for a client. However, this approach almost always results in clients feeling insecure and vulnerable, and it does not lead to the type of trust or loyalty that, in the long run, makes clients return.

Legal Clinic Gives Everyone Low Cost Access To Their Own Law Firm!

Everyone knows you should have a number of professionals on your team if you are serious about building a business or becoming wealthy.

  • Real estate broker
  • Mortgage broker
  • Banker
  • Accountant
  • Contractor
  • Lawyer

Lawyer? What you really need is a Law Firm! Just a you would not go to see a Proctologist for an eye injury, you would want a lawyer who specialized in litigation if you were sued!Using myself as an example of a real estate investor, I have the following legal specialists available to me:

Real Estate Attorney

  • Litigation Attorney
  • Corporate Attorney
  • Landlord and Tenant Attorney
  • SEC Attorney
  • Tax Attorney

Now you may say that you do not need such an array of legal talent at this time and you may be right or you may be wrong. In fact, the number of business people, including real estate investors who do not have an attorney of any kind is shocking! Business is by nature a world of contracts, agreements, negotiations, options etc. trying to do deals without the proper legal counsel is like relying on home remedies when you need the care of a specialist. You are setting yourself up for trouble.If you are sued, you definitely need a high powered litigation attorney. Being represented by a real estate attorney in a lawsuit is like bringing a knife to a gun fight.

If you need an entity such as a corporation or LLC set up correctly for you, you should have access to a corporate attorney. I know, you can set up a corporation yourself on the Internet; but suppose it is the wrong one, an LLC when you should have a C-Corporation for instance?

Do you really want to trust your real estate investment business, with tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, or even millions of dollars in liabilities or profits at stake to a home made corporation?

If you are audited because of your business activities, a very real possibility with the confusing array of tax laws pertaining to businesses, a tax attorney is the only sensible choice to defend you.

The problem with professional legal representation for most of us is cost.

The poor have public defenders to come to their aid.

It use to be that only the “Big Guys” could afford to have a law firm, with all of the legal specialties they needed, on retainer. Until now!

I belong to a “legal clinic” which allows me to have a major law firm on Long Island, NY “on retainer” for about $1 per day.

Many “routine” services are included in the low retainer fee:

I can call “my lawyer” with legal questions at any time

  • They will review contracts and leases of up to 10 pages
  • They will write legal letters on my behalf in case of business disputes
  • They will write legal letters for me to resolve credit or collection issues
  • Help in resolving Warranty issues with products or services
  • Help with Estate problems including a free Will and advice on estate matters
  • Help with preparation for appearance in small claims court, whether defendant or claimant
  • Advise on identifying and contacting the correct government agencies to handle my needs

Can you see how valuable having these services available to you for $1 per day can be? Now, you can nip problems in the bud before they get ugly, by getting the professional advice and assistance of a lawyer at the outset.You can also establish a strong negotiating position by firing off a lawyer’s letter early in the game when in a dispute or a negotiation.

Legal clinics act in the same way health care insurance operates. You have a number of routine services included in your base premium.

When you need more extensive services, they are provided to you at preferred rates, as much as 25% below the firms quoted public rates.

Can you see the difference it could make to your overall success in real estate or other businesses to have a law firm on your team? Wouldn’t you be willing to pay $1 day for their services?

There are several legal clinics in operation, with varying geographic coverage, prices and programs. You can find them on the Internet by searching for “Legal Clinics.”

You can also check with me for more information.

Mesothelioma Legal Information

Mesothelioma is mainly caused by exposure to asbestos during the production or use of asbestos products. It is widely believed that, for sixty years, the companies that dealt with asbestos related products knew about its hazards to health. The dangers of asbestos exposure were kept a secret by the companies for obvious reasons. This holding back of information on the connection between asbestos and mesothelioma has made those companies legally responsible for damages caused by their asbestos products.

Workers who subsequently contract this often fatal disease have the right to file lawsuits for damages. Mesothelioma claims settlements are huge, ranging from $200,000 to millions of dollars. Of course, that depends on the details of the case. Funds are usually set aside to repay the workers and their families.

In the United States, for instance, the median mesothelioma-related settlement is a million dollars. It is reported that cases that went into trial produced an average settlement of $6 million. Yet, it is important to remember that only a small portion of the thousands of asbestos-related lawsuits in the country are linked to mesothelioma.

Finding a decent lawyer to take care of these claims is vital. Since the settlements involve huge sums of money, attorneys are on the lookout for mesothelioma patients. Thus, claimants must take a cautious approach in finding an experienced lawyer to handle their claims.

Some law firms get hold of a mesothelioma victim, and transfer the information to lawyers experienced in handing such cases. Upon doing this, they get a decent referral fee from any successful claim. It is imperative for any lawyer selected to handle a mesothelioma case to have prior experience with litigation involving medical issues.

It is prudent to ask certain questions of attorneys who have been picked to handle the claim. The queries may include his experience in handling mesothelioma claims, the number of claims he has settled and the number that have gone into trial.